<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Terms of the Agreement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkingdom.the-iron-gate.com/2008/11/18/terms-of-the-agreement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkingdom.the-iron-gate.com/2008/11/18/terms-of-the-agreement/</link>
	<description>Growth Through Mental Exercise</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tiggie</title>
		<link>http://thinkingdom.the-iron-gate.com/2008/11/18/terms-of-the-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>tiggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 04:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingdom.the-iron-gate.com/?p=58#comment-242</guid>
		<description>i think if a Master has an integrity he wouldn&#039;t do that -- as it would take away consentuality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think if a Master has an integrity he wouldn&#8217;t do that &#8212; as it would take away consentuality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dion</title>
		<link>http://thinkingdom.the-iron-gate.com/2008/11/18/terms-of-the-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Dion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingdom.the-iron-gate.com/?p=58#comment-229</guid>
		<description>It has nothing to do with right or wrong in my view for Master to change the contract. It has everything to do with trust, respect, responsibility and control. Master must show control of Himself by not agreeing to something He may not be able to live up to. That is a lack of self-control. This will lead to loss of respect from His servant and eventual loss of control of the situation, which leads to rebellion. The way around this is to write into the contract a clause for discussing terms of renewal effective at pre-determined intervals; say, 6 months or one year. At that time the contract may be renegotiated by each party, thus allowing Master to change the contract without losing face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has nothing to do with right or wrong in my view for Master to change the contract. It has everything to do with trust, respect, responsibility and control. Master must show control of Himself by not agreeing to something He may not be able to live up to. That is a lack of self-control. This will lead to loss of respect from His servant and eventual loss of control of the situation, which leads to rebellion. The way around this is to write into the contract a clause for discussing terms of renewal effective at pre-determined intervals; say, 6 months or one year. At that time the contract may be renegotiated by each party, thus allowing Master to change the contract without losing face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mykel</title>
		<link>http://thinkingdom.the-iron-gate.com/2008/11/18/terms-of-the-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>Mykel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingdom.the-iron-gate.com/?p=58#comment-225</guid>
		<description>Absolutely not! While the Master may have the unspoken right to change things with his slave, to do so is to change the dynamic of what was their original relationship. Relationships change, we all know they do, but to unilaterally make the change or coerce the slave into accepting the change, is not only wrong, it is also a breach of the relationship,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely not! While the Master may have the unspoken right to change things with his slave, to do so is to change the dynamic of what was their original relationship. Relationships change, we all know they do, but to unilaterally make the change or coerce the slave into accepting the change, is not only wrong, it is also a breach of the relationship,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riley</title>
		<link>http://thinkingdom.the-iron-gate.com/2008/11/18/terms-of-the-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingdom.the-iron-gate.com/?p=58#comment-198</guid>
		<description>Hello,
I just wanted to thank you for the Thinking Dominant. I am working my way forward from the first posting to the present as a weekly exercise. Keep up the great work.
Best,
Riley</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
I just wanted to thank you for the Thinking Dominant. I am working my way forward from the first posting to the present as a weekly exercise. Keep up the great work.<br />
Best,<br />
Riley</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agreements &#171; Green Rootsdown</title>
		<link>http://thinkingdom.the-iron-gate.com/2008/11/18/terms-of-the-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Agreements &#171; Green Rootsdown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 02:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingdom.the-iron-gate.com/?p=58#comment-168</guid>
		<description>[...]   Once someone enters an M/s relationship, do you think that it’s fair, right, whatever word you want to use [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]   Once someone enters an M/s relationship, do you think that it’s fair, right, whatever word you want to use [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cordage</title>
		<link>http://thinkingdom.the-iron-gate.com/2008/11/18/terms-of-the-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Cordage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingdom.the-iron-gate.com/?p=58#comment-166</guid>
		<description>The original agreement, or contract, is made to bind two people of equal bearing into roles for the relationship. It symbolizes the establishment of their roles and as such, requires all parties to agree to any alterations without coercion. The Master may not unilaterally change the agreement nor influence the slave into agreeing with the change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original agreement, or contract, is made to bind two people of equal bearing into roles for the relationship. It symbolizes the establishment of their roles and as such, requires all parties to agree to any alterations without coercion. The Master may not unilaterally change the agreement nor influence the slave into agreeing with the change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
